X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10aa15,95f8819be42d4c29
X-Google-Attributes: gid10aa15,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-08 10:34:47 PST
Path: nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!library.ucla.edu!psgrain!ticsa.com!cstatd.cstat.co.za!gcohen
From: gcohen@iaccess.za (Gaven Cohen)
Newsgroups: alt.bbs.wildcat
Subject: Re: QWK Scripting
Date: 8 Jun 1994 17:29:19 GMT
Organization: Internet Access public-access service
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2t4v5f$1tm@cstatd.cstat.co.za>
References: <9406081030081426@realty.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.96.87.10
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Jeff Tucker (jeff.tucker@realty.com) wrote:
: Would it be logical for me to assume that a caller who only calls once a
: day to download QWK packets of my USENET conferences (only five of them)
: and never sends reply packets is simply sucking my system???

Provided he does not have net-status to these confs, his importer should 
refuse to import the packets...  (Try import a QWK packet with Tomcat from
another board...  'No net status on conf 90, cannot import' or something
like that...

Cheers
Gaven